You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of the three ensemble methods regarding the number of labels predicted by each model

From: Large-scale online semantic indexing of biomedical articles via an ensemble of multi-label classification models

# of labels predicted from each model  
  MetaLabeler SVM Tuned SVM Vanilla LLDA
Data set A     
Improve micro-F 10751 15002   
Improve F [13] 11256 14497   
MULE 25192 561   
Improve micro-F 19549    6204
Improve F [13] 15293    10460
MULE 25322    431
Improve micro-F    18862 6891
Improve F [13]    12900 12853
MULE    25702 51
Improve micro-F   8213 17037 503
Improve F [13]   8723 16351 679
MULE   25210 526 17
Improve micro-F 10066 2938 2499 250
Improve F [13] 10887 2815 11782 269
MULE 24814 174 760 5
Data set B     
Improve micro-F 4252 12059   
Improve F [13] 4699 11612   
MULE 16053 258   
Improve micro-F 9342    6969
Improve F [13] 10920    5391
MULE 15826    485
Improve micro-F    1500 14811
Improve F [13]    801 15510
MULE    15998 313
Improve micro-F   1804 12774 1733
Improve F [13]   1732 12688 1891
MULE   16121 38 152
Improve micro-F 3817 494 11331 669
Improve F [13] 4198 400 11053 660
MULE 15736 144 117 43
  1. The numbers are given for the micro-F optimization (first series of experiments)